Asking the Right Question

I was recently at a conference where I got to chatting with one of our TeachBeyond missionaries—R—who related a conversation about faith matters she’d just had with several of the grade 12 students at her school. The students would bring up an issue, and R would ask them a question about it. This happened again and again, and by the end of the discussion, the students felt an urgent need to share their faith with some of their non-believing friends. Here’s what really struck me about this conversation: R didn’t offer a whole lot of instruction to the students. The bulk of her interactions was simply asking intentional questions that got the students thinking about the issues in a deeper and more directed way.

As teachers, we often find ourselves feeling pressured to convey a lot of information to our students in a short amount of time. We have curriculum goals to meet, unit plans to finish, high-stakes tests to prepare students for. We want our students to learn, but we often succumb to the temptation to just tell the students what they need to know. This is, after all, the most efficient way to convey information. But we should ask ourselves: How often does this type of instruction cause our students to act directly and out of urgency–as R’s students did following their conversation?

Getting students to think deeply and directly about our subject matter should be one of the goals of our teaching. One very effective way to do this is through the art of asking questions. Not every question, however, is created equal. A team of Harvard researchers spent time looking at teacher questioning in the classroom to better understand what types of questions lead to deeper student engagement.[1] They identified five major categories of questions:

  • Review Questions: asking student to recall previous knowledge and procedures (i.e., Who can tell me how nouns can function in a sentence?)
  • Procedural Questions: directing classroom activity and behavior through questions (i.e., Do you have your notebooks ready?)
  • Generative Questions: using questions to spark inquiry (i.e., What factors or circumstances might allow for the rise of populist leaders whose views many might find extreme?)
  • Constructive Questions: asking questions that help advance student understanding (i.e., How does that connect to what we talked about yesterday? What difference does it make in how we understand this principle?)
  • Facilitative Questions: helping students to elaborate on, deepen, or explain their thinking (i.e., What makes you say that?)

Unfortunately, the same study also uncovered the fact that most teachers relied primarily on the first two categories: questions that manage student behavior and rely on student recall. These types of questions do little, if anything to deepen student engagement with the material.

If we want questions to help our students think for themselves and begin to actively engage with the material they are learning, we need to be intentional about asking more constructive, facilitative, and even generative questions. This is not something that comes naturally to many of us, so it can be very helpful to think through several of these questions prior to stepping into the classroom. Facilitative questions are the easiest to prepare in advance: what makes you say that? Can you tell me more? What do you mean by…? However, it is possible to prepare generative and constructive questions in advance as well:

  • What are the big ideas that you want your students to explore as they encounter this content (generative)?
  • What connections do you want them to be making (constructive)?
  • What previous knowledge do they have that will help them make sense of the new material—or how will the new material change their understanding of previous knowledge (constructive)?

When we come to our lessons prepared with questions designed to encourage our students to think, we are much more likely to step off the stage and allow our students to take responsibility for their own learning. Our preparation allows us to take advantage of the opportunities that arise when students begin to think on their own. And often, we end up learning from our students in these situations as well. It’s a win/win situation!

Becky Hunsberger, M.Ed.
Coordinator of Teacher Education Services
TeachBeyond Global

[1] Ritchart, Ron. Creating Cultures of Thinking: The 8 Forces We Must Master to Truly

Transform Our Schools. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass, 2015. pg. 221-222.

Thinking in an “On Demand” world

8709312455_b91c31faae_mOur world is increasingly fast-paced. Everything around us, from drive-in restaurants to on-line media-streaming services, caters to our desire to have what we want right now. Even our phones, with their magic genies—Alexa, Siri, Cortana—answer our questions within moments. We live in an “on-demand” world.

It is no wonder that in this context, our students are uncomfortable with silence. Not only do they not appreciate it, they don’t really know what to do with it. When a question is asked, they may expect that they have to know the answer right away—and if they don’t, then they can rationalise that they just aren’t smart enough or that the material is too hard. But we know that this isn’t the case. Our brains don’t function as “on-demand” devices. They need time to think, and thinking is a process. It takes time for students to take in information, decode it, process what is being communicated, formulate a response, and then come up with a way to communicate that response to others. This process takes even longer if you are dealing with students who are naturally introverted[1] or who are functioning in a second or third language.

So what does this mean for us in the classroom? One thing is that we as teachers can do is to provide the time and space to encourage thinking. We can help our students understand that thinking is a process, and that it is okay to take time to formulate an answer to a question. But we must remember that our actions often send a louder message than our words. So in addition to telling students about how the brain works, we need to incorporate thinking time into our classes.

One of the simplest—and most effective—ways to do this is to make it a practice to include wait time after asking a question. Wait time refers to the 5-6 seconds post question where you allow your students to think about their responses. But while simple, providing wait time is not always easy. These five seconds can seem like an eternity, especially when you are confronted by that student in the second row—you know the one, the student who is frantically waving his arm in the air and practically jumping out of his seat because he wants to share his answer. It can be hard to let the students sit in silence, especially when hands start to shoot up. It takes discipline on the part of the teacher to make this practice a consistent classroom routine. It can even, at times, feel like a waste of valuable instructional time.

However, when you intentionally make students wait before allowing anyone to answer, you are signaling to your class that you do expect everyone to take time to think about and be prepared to respond to what you’ve asked. You give your language learners time to translate or decode the question. You provide students who take a little more time to come up with a response the opportunity to raise their hands. You even provide those over-eager students the chance to really evaluate the answer they are dying to give, instead of just letting them blurt out the first thing that popped into their heads. The practice of wait time actually increases student engagement[2]. It also increases the likelihood that students will provide a correct or well-reasoned answer[3]. Wait time gives students permission to slow down in the midst of the frantic pace of modern life. And in freeing them from the pressures of life “on-demand,” we empower students to be in control of their learning, and help to boost their confidence. That’s a pretty great return on the investment of pausing just a few extra seconds in class.

Becky Hunsberger, M.Ed.
Coordinator of Teacher Education
TeachBeyond Global


[1] The physiology of how introverts process information is actually quite a bit different from the way their extroverted peers do. For more about this, check out some of the work by Marti Olsen Laney and others on what makes introverts different.

[2] Honea, 1982; Swift & Gooding, 1983.

[3] Rowe, 1987.

Photo CreditsOn-DemandWanderingtheWorld (www.ChrisFord.com), Flickr via Compfight cc.  Leicester Square McDonaldsvinylmeister, flickr. ccStopwatch, stevepaustin Flickr via Compfight cc.

English Camps - TeachBeyond

Remember going to camp?

If you would like to know more about your opportunity to join one of camps as a volunteer this summer then click the link below-

Camps 2018

Following Jesus’ Example

What is the difference between a Christian teacher and a secular teacher? Is it just that we tell the children stories from the Bible and pray with them? Or should it be reflected in the way that we do things and the way that we teach? How did Jesus and the rest of the godly people in the Bible teach and learn? Should we be following their examples? These are all questions that we have been thinking about and discussing with the teachers that we are working with in the mountain villages of South Asia.

How did Jesus teach his disciples? They sat before Him and listened to the things that he had to share.[1] He demonstrated for them how they should do their ministry.[2] They then worked alongside Him trying out the things that He talked about while He watched and gave them feedback.[3] When Jesus saw that they had a strong enough understanding to try this on their own, He sent them out to do just that.[4] They went out and tried it, but sometimes failed.[5] They returned to Jesus and asked why some of their healing didn’t work and He again gave them feedback.[6] They went out and tried again.[7]

8597009314_b21446f329_z

As we look at this, we are amazed at how closely it resembles the progression from a teacher-centered teaching method to a student-centered teaching method that we have worked so hard to teach our teachers. Teacher-centered teaching is what Jesus did with His disciples at the beginning. However He didn’t stay there. He pushed them to actually do the things they’d seen Him do. In some things they were successful, but they also had their failures. However, because of their relationship with Jesus, they felt free to come and ask Him for further advice on the matter and He was able to give them feedback reminding them of the things that He had taught. They then eagerly went back out and tried again.

If this is how Jesus taught, then shouldn’t we be following His example? How much time do we spend in lessons that are teacher-centered? Do we allow students to put their skills to use on new problems—even struggling through them and failing occasionally? Or would we rather rush on to the next lesson so that we can finish the curriculum? Have we learned to distinguish when to back off and when to step in with the scaffolding necessary to help students succeed?

14452549825_c48bcaaa9a_m

Taking time to think through and apply the answers to these questions will force us as teachers to move from teaching about a Christian worldview to teaching within a Christian worldview. Our students will experience what it means to encounter the world as image-bearers of Christ. I believe that this is how the Creator designed learning to happen.

Sue Rollins

Teacher Mentor & Educator

[1] Luke 6:20-sermon on the mount

[2] John 13—washing the disciples’ feet

[3] Mark 8—the feeding of the 4,000

[4] Luke 10—Jesus sends out the 72

[5] Mark 9—the demon possessed boy

[6] Matthew 17:14-21—the demon possessed boy

[7] Acts 3—Peter & John heal the lame man

Photo CreditsStained Glass Disciplesjpellgen via Compfight cc, Students Experimenting.  Pioneer Library System via Compfight cc.

Time is Running Out…

If you haven’t yet registered for this summer’s Transformational Education Conference in Manila, Philippines, now is the time to so. Registration closes on April 30, 2016. This conference–and it’s sister program, the K-12 School Leadership Program–is a great opportunity for you to grow in your own professional development. You can earn ACSI CEUs as well as a continuing education certificate from TeachBeyond by participating in this 4 day event. If finances are a problem, scholarships are available by contacting institute@teachbeyond.org.   

For more information or to register for the conference, visit  http://teachbeyond.org/teachbeyond-conference/